Book Review: "From outside the box, a positive vision for the planet"
REVIEW
Title: Bright Future: abundance and progress in the 21st century
Author: David McMullen
Publisher: brightfuture publications
240 pp
$20
Reviewer: Barry York
As
a young long-haired student radical in the late 1960s, I used to gain
inspiration from a cartoon that appeared in my university newspaper.
The multi-panelled strip commenced with two characters crouched tightly
in a sparse door-less little room. One of the characters stretches out
his arms, accidentally damaging a wall. He becomes curious and starts
making a hole in the wall but his companion is distressed and urges him
to desist, lest he damage the room. The final panel shows an aerial
view of the scene: both figures are actually confined in a tiny box but
outside the box is a beautiful big sunny world. The message was and is
clear: creativity requires destruction, a better world only comes from
overturning the familiar safe one.
David McMullen’s book is refreshing in that it revives that spirit in consideration of the future. His
analysis will jar anyone who uncritically accepts the prevailing ethos
of ‘doom and gloom’. He reclaims rational optimism and rebelliousness,
rejecting the inherent conservatism of opposition to globalisation and
modern industrial society – which he characterises as pseudo-left.
Bright
Future is no mere polemic. McMullen’s training in economics informs his
view as much as his decades of involvement in left-wing movements. His
analysis is essentially a Marxist one, though this is not stated in the
book. The text is meticulously researched and there are nearly 700
endnotes to lead the critical reader into sources of substantiation for
claims made. The book will either be ignored or, hopefully, will have
an influence in promoting debate about the issues canvassed, including,
controversially, the author’s support for ‘collective ownership’ as an
alternative to capitalism.
The
content is wide-ranging but focuses strongly on the question of food
production and world hunger, affluence and resource exploitation.
Specific issues discussed include GM foods, soil degradation, water,
fisheries, non-renewable resources, fossil fuels, global warming,
alternative energies, nuclear power, pollution, deforestation and
species extinction. He shows how food production can be increased
through technological and scientific advance and better management
practices. It is possible he argues, to eliminate hunger by the end of
the century ‘The planet’s capacity to comfortably accommodate us’, he
says, ‘is limited only by the application of human ingenuity, something
we are never going to run out of’.
While
not downplaying environmental problems, McMullen’s take is that Nature
is remarkably resilient and human impact is minor compared to the
planet’s ‘battering on a regular basis from super volcanoes, meteors
and ice ages’. Moreover, the affluence of modern industrial societies
is what allows for environmental awareness and protection. For
example, the best way to save the tropical forests is to integrate the
children of subsistence farmers into the modern economy rather than to
idealize their way of life.
The
author sees capitalism as playing a continuing progressive role in
those places still emerging from pre-industrial feudalistic systems and
a section of the text dealing with the problem of kleptocracy in
What
makes McMullen’s book unusual and important however is that it does not
reach the conclusion of those who argue from the Right that material
progress under capitalism is our benefactor and that this system is
therefore the ‘end of history’. McMullen points out that affluence
under capitalism continues to mask gross inequality and is only
achieved through the alienation of wage slavery which chokes personal
development and human initiative.
He
argues that the continuing industrial revolution creates the conditions
necessary for capitalism’s demise. As technological change
progressively does away with the old back-breaking, dangerous and
boring jobs, making work more complex, interesting and challenging, the
need for a capitalist ruling class becomes less and less. More than
half the workforce in the most advanced industrial societies now
requires post-secondary education. With the automation of the most
unpleasant jobs, who needs the profit motive? And who needs what
McMullen calls “the master class”?
Collective
ownership, he argues, will be ‘the obvious way to go’ and would unleash
the creative energies of the individual, ‘freeing the economy from the
distorting effects of sectional interest’. This, he says, is ‘real free
enterprise’.
The
obvious challenge to McMullen’s thesis is that socialism, when
attempted under Communist governments, has failed. To this he responds
that the experience of such socialism has been limited to places that
had barely emerged from feudalism and had not yet developed advanced
forms of industrial capitalism.
‘Bright Future’ is a scintillatingly dangerous book; a threat to the stability of walls and boxed thinking everywhere.