The Unheralded Revolution: Can the Gains Made by Iraq's Women Be Echoed Elsewhere?
washingtonpost.com
By Jim Hoagland
Thursday, February 24, 2005;
Nearly one-third of the 140 winning candidates on the Shiite
parliamentary list are women. Moreover, those 45 women from the list
supported by Grand Ayatollah Ali Sistani tend to be more educated,
better informed and more committed to change than are their male
counterparts, who include a number of political hacks.
Bush has been in Europe this week emphasizing the overall importance of
the Jan. 30 elections and his commitment to transforming the
autocracies of the Middle East and Central Asia into a zone of peaceful
democracies.
But the president's failure thus far to highlight the success of women
in the elections -- 31 percent of Iraq's newly elected 275
parliamentarians are women -- suggests that not even he fully
appreciates the forces of change that he may have unleashed by toppling
dictatorships in Iraq and Afghanistan.
Nor do gender liberationists in the West seem eager to publicize this
stunning result. Could they not want to accept even implicitly the
notion that war can create the conditions needed for a positive social
revolution?
That revolution ultimately is even more important to transforming the
Middle East than is U.S. military might or European diplomacy. There
will be no democracy in the greater Middle East until women break
through the crippling restrictions and humiliations imposed on them by
Arab cultural chauvinism and widespread, if perverse, interpretations
of Islamic faith.
History suggests that social revolutions occur when frustration with
the present combines with emergent hope for a better future to form a
critical mass that is ignited by a spark of personal resistance.
Americans saw this happen when Rosa Parks refused to move to the back
of the bus and African American students staged sit-ins at Woolworth's
lunch counters nearly half a century ago.
Those students, W.E.B. Du Bois told an oral history interviewer then,
"put their fingers on something" big by fighting back against the small
daily humiliations of segregation and the spiteful shows of domination
meant to demonstrate immediate white control. (A tape of this absorbing
interview was broadcast this week on C-SPAN Radio.)
Is a movement similar to the American civil rights revolution
imaginable for women in the Arab world today? It is a stretch, for
obvious reasons of power and gender relationships. But it is certainly
more imaginable after the Iraqi election results and after the breaking
of the malignant political status quo that has prevailed in the region
for at least three decades.
On assignments in the Middle East for The Post throughout that period,
I found much to admire in the natural hospitality and intellectual
achievements of Arab society. But for someone raised in the segregated
American South, there is also much that is familiar -- constant
reminders of small daily humiliations and spiteful shows of domination
both cultural and sexual.
This was brought back to me recently as I listened to a senior Cabinet
minister from an important Arab country criticize Bush's Broader Middle
East and North Africa Initiative to foster democracy in that Islamic
belt. The official spoke candidly in return for not being identified.
Other conversations with Arab officials confirm that his views are far
from isolated:
Bush dared to lump the Arabs and the more primitive people of
Afghanistan together in this initiative. He also brought Turkey's
overly "liberal" Islamic society into the picture. The Americans had
not understood that Arabs are "conservative people who have their own
way of doing things," and who form the core of the Islamic world. And
don't compare us to Iraqis, either, please.
All that was missing was a condemnation of Bush and his aides as "outside agitators."
Against this entrenched mind-set, the elections in Iraq -- in which
political parties were required to field enough female candidates to
ensure that they would make up at least one-quarter of the national
assembly -- may seem like a straw in the wind.
But in telephone conversations and e-mail exchanges with Iraqis in
Baghdad last weekend, frustration and hope mingled in a combustible
mix, as security continued to be precarious and the final results were
announced.
"The fact is, the women candidates had to be competent to get on the
list. They met higher standards," said Nabil Musawa, a campaign
strategist for the Iraqi National Congress. The example they have set,
and will continue to provide, cannot be lost on Arab women at large.